|
|
This
site was built October/November 2008. Its purpose is to serve as a
timeline of our efforts to address both the structural damage inflicted
on Lower Oxford Street by then Lord Mayor, Frank Sartor and the RTA
& the continuing neglect of the Golden Mile by its largest land
owner, the City of Sydney Council.
|
|
|
|
08/09/11
|
Businesses
have the right to vote in Local Government elections, but
you wouldn't know it.
|
| 16/08/11
|
See
how two State Government Departments have fobbed the issue
off. Not what you would expect from a Liberal Government that
is supposed to give a toss about business.
Fobbed by Local
Government Minister
Fobbed by
Small Business Minister
See
here for the response to the Small Business Minister.
==========================
Dear Minister
Thanks
for your reply.
I
appreciate the information you have provided regarding mentoring
and small business support, but perhaps you have missed my
point, or more likely, I have not made it clear enough.
Personally,
my business does not need help, so if that’s what you
thought I was getting at, sorry.
My
concern, and the reason I spent the last seven years as committee
member and then VP of the Local Business Partnership was because
of my alarm at the state of the local main street, in this
case Oxford Street.
As
I have said, I am not concerned for my business, I have a
niche and am up to speed on social media and contemporary
forms of marketing and in fact, we moved off Oxford Street
ten years ago because it was already in decline prior to the
RTA’s and CoS’s ham-fisted upgrade. This was primarily
due to a combination of socio-cultural factors, nailed irrevocably
into place by said upgrade.
It
was in the course of my involvement with the Darlinghurst
Business Partnership and the contacts with other like-minded
groups this afforded me that I came to see that what was happening
to Oxford Street was part of a broader phenomenon.
Without
getting into details, the vastly more penetrative marketing
tools available to Malls and combined with the simple fact
of the Internet, is threatening your Main Streets, and thus
your urban life in a very serious way. No workshops or seminars
or the like can compete with these forces and no local business
group can hope to muster the muscle to compete on their own.
They lack the capacity.
Couple
this with the strange and worrying focus that NSW Tourism,
through Events NSW, has on, surprise, just putting on Events
that simply people attend and leave, and with City of Sydney’s
myopic focus on the CBD and the paltry amount of business
rates it returns to the business sector, and you end up where
we are today.
It’s
the reason Sydney has slipped to number three on the list
of desirable domestic holiday destinations behind Melbourne
and Brisbane
SHFA
could be a model, as too could the way that Melbourne takes
pride in and actively promotes its Main Streets and has a
functioning 24-hour city economic policy.
London
has just appointed a retail Tsar for the very same reasons.
Please
don’t think that, as a small business owner, I don’t
appreciate the fact that you make all the varied programs
available through the smallbiz website, but without a dedicated,
coordinated, active signaling and championing that you, as
a government, value your Main Streets and the culture they
provide, you will continue to see them deteriorate.
For
all the above reasons I have left the local business group,
happy as they now are to simply take council’s money
and dance to the networking event tune without even a peep
of advocacy.
I am now focusing solely on my businesses, but it still makes
me sad to see Sydney sell itself so short on the domestic
and international tourism markets. You wouldn’t believe
the number of visitors who ‘accidentally’ find
themselves on the Eastside (2010 & 2011) who have never
even heard of Newtown.
Really,
destination, whole-of-year, whole-of-city marketing is not
so hard to grasp, why NSW is still so blindly focused on events
is baffling.
I
hope this information helps you understand the dilemma somewhat.
Regards
Stephan
Gyory
|
20/07/11
|
meh!
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/down-and-out-in-drear-street-20110709-1h7mw.html
http://www.smh.com.au/travel/travel-news/sydney-in-third-place-in-fight-for-domestic-travellers-20110616-1g637.html
|
15/07/11
|
A
letter to the Minister for Transport regarding NSW's new Transport
Authority:
Ms
Gladys Berejiklian, MP
Level 35 Governor Macquarie Tower
1 Farrer Place
SYDNEY NSW 2000
Dear Minister
It
was with great interest that I read the article in today’s
SMH: http://smh.drive.com.au/rta-to-be-killed-off-20110715-1hh3r.html
I
was, however, troubled by the following statement:
"The
focus for the integrated transport authority is the customer,
be it a public transport user, a motorist, pedestrian or producer
such as a farmer or manufacturer. The customer will be at
the centre of everything we do."
Possibly
one of the greatest problems with the RTA as it currently
stands is that it does not consider the communities that cars
travel through. The statment above seems to reflect the same
kind of thinking, the kind of thinking that lead to the creation
of economic and cultural wastelands like parts Parramatte
road and Lower Oxford Street, Sydney.
This
is the same kind of thinking that now seem to inform the debate
on Light Rail up Oxford Street, where the leading proposal
is that there will only be two stops between Hyde Park and
Moore Park.
This
kind of two-dimentional, mass-transit thinking completely
ignores that fact that viable cities have a fine grain, and
that it is this fine grain that makes different parts of different
cities appealing different parts of communites; creating character,
amenity and livability, all things a an international city
should be striving for.
To
consider points A and B as isolated entities to be connected
by the straightest, fastest, least friction-causing line possible
is to completely ignore the fact that we live in distributed,
interconnected networks with many, many nodes. The internet
doesnt work by simply connecting A and B, nor does the economy,
and no one with an inkling of how the world works today would
debate this.
I
sincerely hope that this new agency will concern itself with
the bigger picture as well as its’ “customers”
and perhaps take as a guiding principle the following concept,
articulated by some contemporary writers here, but well known
to cultures the world over:
"The
road of life twists and turns and no two directions are ever
the same. Yet our lessons come from the journey, not the destination.”
Don Williams, Jr. (American Novelist and Poet, b.1968)
“Focus
on the journey, not the destination. Joy is found not in finishing
an activity but in doing it.” Greg Anderson (American
best-selling Author and founder of the American Wellness Project.,
b.1964)
I
implore you, in the creation of this new entity, not just
to co-ordinate all modes of transport with each other, but
to co-ordinate transport with the communities they serve and
pass through.
Regards
Stephan
Györy
0414 581 919
PDF
|
01/07/11
|
Well,
London has figured it out.
"The Government's attempt to stop the rot
is the appointment of TV retail guru Mary Portas to the post
of "Retail Czar". But for these local shops, Portas's
appointment is too little too late?... "
link
|
28/06/11
|
One
can only hope these words turn into actions but it's fair
to say that we have heard our fair share of words. The reaction
on the street so far has been, shall we say, resigned cynicism.
Would that this were not the case!
It is interesting to note the language. The document (link
below) repeatedly uses the phrase ‘perceived’
lack of daytime trade, which basically means they
are ducking the obvious, protecting themselves from goodness
knows what, for what can only be assumed to be the usual,
bureaucratic reticence to take responsibility for anything.
On a positive nore they do refer to Lower Oxford Street, which
means thay have finally and, at least tacitly, admitted that
the area is a town centre in its own right - distinct from
Paddington.
At
Monday night’s City Council meeting, Lord Mayor Clover
Moore tabled a Minute calling for the Chief Executive Officer
to investigate a range of options to activate Oxford Street,
including:
• Utilising City-owned properties on Oxford Street for
the provision of affordable creative spaces
• Utilising City-owned properties to achieve a greater
diversity in Oxford Street’s mix of commercial and retail
businesses to support the daytime economy
• Encouraging and engaging private property owners to
work with the City to ensure a diverse and robust daytime
economy; a significant village centre for Darlinghurst and
Surry Hills and an important focus for cultural and creative
activity
• Develop strategies to improve Oxford Street’s
amenity by: moving traffic from the kerbside; changing bus
operations to reduce noise impacts; improving pedestrian crossings
and making physical improvements to support Oxford Street’s
potential use as a light rail route.
READ THE FULL
DOCUMENT HERE
|
24/06/11
|
The
latest correspondence.
Dear Clover, Councilors, Functionaries, Bureaucrats and Stakeholders
I was going to apologise for
this series of seemingly negative emails, but then thought,
why should I apologise for documenting this grand failure
of vision?
Did I mention that Alan Cadogan
(CoS head of Strategy, or something) admitted, point-blank,
in a meeting with us last year that there was NO VISION for
Oxford street? Inspiring stuff!
I must say, that while I get
multiple (positive and supportive) responses from the community
(business and residents) I have had a grand total of NONE,
from council.
Well done, representatives
and tax payer funded council staff!
Is this standard operating
procedure within council? Duck and cover when the hard questions
arise?
Do we need to come to Committee
and community meetings and haul you through the coals ‘on
the record’ and in public? Because that is what is going
to happen.
Perhaps next time we should
ask you why you reneged on a stakeholder’s forum (that
was promised in front of 100 people) and replaced it with
a Lord Mayor’s Round Table, that the Lord Mayor did
not even attend, the results of which seem destined to be
filed away with all the other documentation we have provided
you over the years.
Regarding the subject line
of this email, you have lost another one, Deus. (In addition
to Snakebean restaurant, House of Fetish fashion store and
espionage shoe store in the last month)
http://www.dailyaddict.com.au/DA/client/c_index.jsp
As per usual I will be posting
this on the http://www.saveoxfordstreet.com/ website and forwarding
it to various State Government ministers.
Warm
Regards
Stephan Gyory
0414581919
|
09/06/11
|
Can the internet save character based/high street small
business?
The
striking thing about the advent of the internet and the impact
it has had on ‘bricks and mortar’ business is
the unidirectional nature of most analyses.
The
conversation primarily revolves around what will move online,
when and what existing business can do about it, if anything.
The short answer to that question is ‘nothing’.
It is happening and will continue to happen until the old
monopoly of supply is almost completely done away with.
As
more industries come to terms with the loss of their monopoly
positions, things like service and shopping experience are
returning to lexicon of retail and this is a good thing. But
this does not change the fact that the internet, once and
for all, has split those erstwhile bed fellows ‘shopping’
and ‘consuming’.
Consumption, by its very nature, will move online and if people
think this will exclude industries like fashion, think again.
Virtual mirrors are not long in the offing and there is no
conceivable reason to believe that any industry is secure
from the ease, convenience and cost-effectiveness of the internet.
The
response from government has been patchwork and reactive at
best. Only yesterday the Sydney Morning Herald reported on
a series of seminars sponsored by Paypal, teaching small town
businesses how to improve their online presence, ostensibly
to compete.
If
not flawed, then this is a highly myopic view of the solution.
Conduct a simple through experiment. If you had unlimited
funds, time and skill, could your existing business create
an online presence that could in anyway compete with the established
online players?
The answer here, in almost 100% of cases, is no. And yet the
focus seems to be simply helping small businesses get online,
as if this is the only choice there is.
While
an online strategy and making use of the many free social
tools available are an important part of any small businesses
strategy, they alone will not help a bricks and mortar business
survive, let alone thrive.
And
let’s face it, the goal of any bricks and mortar small,
independent business is not just to migrate wholly onto the
internet, it is to actually survive in the real world while
using the internet as both a tool and an additional revenue
stream.
But
how can they do this in the face of the current onslaught?
In
the same way that massive online retailers and shopping malls
manage their environments, the main street/high street shopping
precincts also need to be managed. Unfortunately, small businesses
and small business groups simply lack the capacity to do this.
So who then?
The
answer here is government; local, state and federal.
The usual response to this proposition is that they, government,
have a very limited role to play in whether or not businesses
survive or fail as this is the role of the market. But what
government seems to have missed in their protestations is
that this very question, the survival of small, independent
retailers, has profound cultural and community repercussions
because the demise of main street shopping is intimately linked
the livability of cities.
Amenity,
diversity, passive security, quality of life, even community
are all fundamentally linked to the activities that go on
in any centre and for humans, being economic creatures, this
means small businesses; coffee shops, the local book store,
the butcher. All of these things go into making a community
viable, livable and desirable and a lot more than a convenient
local shopping experience is lost when these things fail.
And it is not only what leaves that change the environment,
but what takes its place: pubs, pokies, late night eateries
and the revelers these things attract.
This
is not an attack on late night economies, but an assertion
that a when late night economy exists in isolation, the community
it is embedded within suffers.
Therefore, to protect the quality of life and amenity of its
citizens and the very livability of its cities the government
must take an active role in the management of its main street
precincts. Small businesses, no matter how motivated, cannot
do it. They do not have the time, capacity or budget to compete
with the marketing clout of Westfield, let alone the entire
internet.
Until
this responsibility is not only accepted but embraced, we
will see more and more bricks and mortar businesses close
and bit by bit the personality of city precincts will either
be sanitized by chains that can afford to compete simply on
price or turned into demented night time playgrounds.
Stephan
Gyory
www.saveoxfordstreet.com
|
| 09/06/11
|
It
had to happen, there is only so long you can keep saying the
same thing and not be listened to before you stop playing Council's
game and start playing your own. Due to Council's response to
our round-table meeting with every City of Sydney head of department
I have penned the following letter. Minutes to the round-table
are here
and replies to my letter are below.
----------------
Hello fellow Darlinghurst and Surry Hills business folk,
This
email is about the state of Lower Oxford Street and my thoughts
around the role of the 2010 Partnership.
Upfront,
I have to advise you that after having a second stab at getting
back involved with the Business Group, I have resigned as
Vice President and have also left the 2010 Partnership. This
is not something I did lightly but I have come to the sorry
conclusion that the partnership serves no one’s interests
other than the councils'.
Frankly,
through design or not, to volunteer on a business group in
Sydney is to sign up as an indentured servant of the ever
fattening Economic Development Department at council, whose
sole job, it seems, is to tick an ever-lengthening list of
boxes while paying lip service to the people they are supposed
to work with and support.
The
fact that every warning and bit of information we have given
them over the last seven years has come to pass, seems to
elude them and still they press on with airy-fairy, out of
touch and out of date plans that no one consented to or even
thinks make sense.
So,
I have done this now for the same reasons that Andrew Duckmanton
(Grandma Takes A Trip), Marc Althshuler (Oxford Art Supplies)
and I did in December 2009 when we decided to let the DBP
lapse. Our reasoning and thoughts were that while there is
a Council asleep at the wheel, who don't know how to care
about or engage with the business community, in charge of
a 24 million dollar infrastructure disaster that is tearing
this area in two, there is simply no role for a networking
group that takes council money and puts on nice little events.
Unfortunately,
the continued existence of such a group, in this case the
2010 Partnership, formerly the Darlinghurst Business Partnership,
means the council can point to it and say 'look, we support
business' when in fact they don't support business and they
don't support this area.
The
group, unfortunately, is effectively a political patsy and
distracts from the very real issue of the complete abandonment
of Lower Oxford Street by the council; the disastrous way
in which they manage their properties and their unexplainable
reticence to take responsibility for turning Lower Oxford
Street into a Highway, Retail Desert and Night-Time duo-culture.
In
fact, the entire model the council uses to engage with business
is flawed. Even though small and medium businesses in this
City contribute over half of the Council's rate revenue, are
14% of the city’s workforce, 37% of all business and
13% of floor space, for some reason all Council wants from
us in terms of engagement are some tea-party-organising, personal
agenda-driven, isolated, competing groups that are completely
ineffectual in the face of this relentless bureaucratising
of everything the council touches.
Instead
of adapting to the way the world is, this council wants the
world to adapt to the way they think it should be and unfortunately
the only way to get through to them is not to work with (read
for) them but to constantly ask them hard questions in public.
Tenants
with no leases. Abandoned five year old actions plans. A complete
lack of vision for Oxford Street. A horrifyingly myopic focus
on the CBD. Reactive Policy created on the fly. Generic, top-down
thinking. That is City of Sydney council and by taking their
money and jumping through their bureaucratic hoops we simply
legitimise their way of doing business.
Further
to this, they have just advised that there will be NO FURTHER
ACTIONS from the Darlinghurst Roundtable they held on 6th
May (the minutes I distributed earlier this week). That’s
right – no further action – the exact words were
‘the traders in the area wanted to be heard, the roundtable
achieved this and the council has no formal plans for further
action although many of the thoughts will be considered by
council officers when making decisions’ and this was
from a mid-level Economic Development bureaucrat and goes
completely against the CEO’s email of 2 weeks previous
suggesting they wanted to move forward on all points we raised!
But she is away now so it seems the machine is running itself
again.
And
that is the point, one hand doesn;t know what they other is
doing doing, yet they don’t want to engage with or listen
to the electorate/rate-payers as they think they know best,
when it is clear from their actions (and lack of them) that
they don’t.
This
area deserves more than that. Ideally, we need a thriving
business group that is focussed on getting more people here
during the day, but unfortunately any time people put their
hands up to join, their passion and enthusiasm get systematically
whittled down until the group implodes under the pressure
of having to bash their heads against the same bureaucratic
wall, ad infinitum.
So,
while I will continue to act and speak up for this area and
attend meetings and attempt force council to account for themselves,
I will do this as an individual and so I implore the current
leadership of the 2010 partnership to fold, what has become
not only an irrelevant organization, but a rudderless distraction
serving no one’s goals but the councils’.
Stephan Gyory
PS
- Snakebean just shut. House of Fetsh just gone. (Another)
Pie face opening up at Taylor square
------------
Hi
Stephan
Well done I agree and I suggest you send this to the Premier
and the minister for Local Government Cheers from one who
also tried
------------
Hi
Stephan,
Sad
to see you’ve finally been forced to give up thru the
exasperating lack of vision by the council. You did a brilliant
job and always showed and energetic interest that was admirable.
Let hope the future doesn’t get fucked up too much by
Sydney City..
Good luck.
------------
Hi
Stephan-
I meet you whilst you were down in Melbourne.
I appreciate all the effort you've put into this.
So so frustrating - it would be nice if they got their shit
together.
We're all doing our little bit on our block on Crown St.
Thanks for all the effort you put into this.
best,
------------
Hi
Stephan. Couldn't agree with you more. Ditto all the other
"villages" making up the city of Sydney. None has
any direct contact with council, no representative from council
who gives a damn about small business. We are simply a tool
for tax. Like to chat with ylou sometime. ************** has
stopped all its time wasting dinners and networking and become
a pressure group. Create a public disturbance via the press.
Nothing gets done otherwise.
------------
Excellent !
|
27/04/11
|
Well,
we have been granted an audience with the powers that be at
City of Sydney Council. It was not the independently facilitated,
open forum of all stakeholders (Business, Council, Landlords)
that we had hoped for, asked for and been promised at the
City
East Community Update in October 2010,
but it is something and it's good to see that the agenda -
an official Council document - acknowledges what we have been
saying about Lower Oxford Street for years.
PDF
- DARLINGHURST BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE
NB:
It must be noted that the efforts to revitalise Taylor Square,
as mentioned in the City East Community update above, a little
more than lip service. The Markets in Taylor square are not
run by council nor were they instigated at Council's behest.
The idea to purchase T2 came from our quarter and it was a
last ditch effort to stop Taylor Square being cornered completely
by night time businesses. There is currently no legitimate
plan, that we know of, to do anything else to try and fix
the social and cultural vacuum at Taylor Square and the plans
(food hall/grocery-based department store) to 'revitalise'
Council's large Property holdings along the north side of
Lower Oxford Street, are not only four years out of date,
but have been completely gazumped by the re-development of
the old Water Board building on the Crown Street reservoir.
Council's management of their own properties on Lower Oxford
Street, which they have outsourced to, what is by all accounts,
a negligent and out of touch property management company,
are shameful and had any private company operated in this
way, heads would have rolled long ago.
|
| 24/02/11
|
Finally:
SANITY. Coalition
Goverment to re-introduce trams
ALMOST
50 years to the day after the last tram in Sydney made its final
journey, the Coalition will announce the return of light rail
to the suburbs.
The opposition's transport
spokeswoman, Gladys Berejiklian, will today release plans
for a light rail line from Circular Quay to the University
of NSW. The plan would restore trams to Anzac Parade, which
was designed specifically for light rail.
On 25 February, 1961, the
last tram in NSW ran from Hunter Street in the city to La
Perouse. The Cahill Labor government - cited by the former
Labor premier Bob Carr as a model government - had begun ripping
up one of the world's most extensive tram networks in 1953.
Advertisement: Story continues
below
Ms Berejiklian told the Herald: ''We have been strong advocates
of light rail, even when Labor was attacking us for it at
the 2007 election. We have been looking at the expansion of
light rail in North America and believe it is part of Sydney's
future, and not just in the central business district.''
Labor supports extending existing
light rail from Lilyfield to Dulwich Hill and a tram line
between Central and Circular Quay but the Coalition would
go further by restoring the service to the south-eastern suburbs.
Ms Berejiklian is leaving
open the prospect of extending the line to Kingsford.
The implications of the plan
are clear - sealing a victory for the Liberals in the seat
of Coogee and placing them within striking distance of winning
Maroubra.
The Coalition would also ''incorporate
existing light rail services into the MyZone ticketing system''
and insist that light rail fares are covered by the proposed
electronic ticketing system.
''Light rail in the city will
only succeed if it is part of a broader network,'' Ms Berejiklian
said.
The Coalition plan has the
backing of community leaders, including the former Labor minister
Rodney Cavalier, who chairs the Sydney Cricket Ground Trust.
Mr Cavalier, along with the
vice-chancellor of the University of NSW, Fred Hilmer, and
the chief executive of the Australian Turf Club, Darren Pearce,
say the light rail would improve access for sports fans, students
and racegoers at three of the biggest institutions in the
eastern suburbs.
The Coalition policy, citing
data from the Gold Coast light rail project, says trams can
carry 10,000 passengers an hour, giving them more capacity
than buses.
Randwick council, UNSW, the
Australian Turf Club and three hospitals in Randwick are signing
a memorandum of understanding to support the light rail extension
to the east.
"Randwick council transport
studies have found we are going to need a 50 per cent increase
in public transport capacity in Randwick city by 2021 to effectively
accommodate anticipated population and employment growth,''
said the Randwick mayor, Murray Matson.
"More than 100 international
cities have reintroduced light rail because they can see the
benefit of moving millions of people quickly and safely for
work, education and recreation.''
Ms Berejiklian would not identify
a specific light rail route until after a Coalition government
had finished a feasibility study but the most likely route
- based on plans from the City of Sydney - would involve a
line along Liverpool Street and Oxford Street and then on
to Flinders Street and Anzac Parade.
|
| 1/12/10
|
This
is only the the latest in the seemingly neverending series
of events that show clearly City of Sydney Council's almost
complete disdain for small business. I include
their press release first and then a series of reponses from
community stakeholders to complete the picture.
-----------------------------------------
City of Sydney Media Release
New Panel Shaping the Future of Sydney Retail Industry, government
and the City of Sydney have joined forces to shape the future
of retail growth in Sydney.
The
City of Sydney has created the new retail advisory panel -
17 leading businesses and stakeholders tasked with positioning
Sydney as Australia’s best retail destination.
Lord
Mayor Clover Moore MP said the panel would identify and create
opportunities for the retail sector to capitalise on major
events and tourism campaigns.
“The City of Sydney led Retail Advisory Panel is all
about delivering great outcomes for Sydney retail businesses.
It will provide advice on how to meet consumer demand,”
she said.
Panel members include Westfield, Transport NSW, Australian
National Retailers Association, David Jones, IPOH, Dymocks
and Tourism NSW.
Minister for Tourism Jodi McKay said Sydney’s dynamic
fashion and food scene was boosting the city’s global
appeal as a shopping mecca.
“Visiting
shoppers are worth more than $1 billion each year to the retail
sector in Sydney and NSW,” Ms McKay said.
“Working
with Sydney’s leading retailers and with the tourism
industry, we can help visitors to Sydney make the most of
their trip and encourage them to stay longer and spend more.”
The
retail sector employs more than 14% of the City’s workforce,
makes up around 37% of all businesses (7,400 businesses) and
13% of floor space in the City of Sydney area.
“Sydney
needs an integrated strategy to keep us globally competitive,
innovative and vibrant,” Ms Moore said.
Retail Advisory Panel members:
Clover Moore MP, Lord Mayor, City of Sydney
Don Grover, CEO Dymocks Group of Companies (Chair)
Richard Sheldrake, Director General, Department of Industry
& Investment
Glen Byres, Executive Director, NSW, Property Council of Australia
The Hon. Patricia Forsythe, Executive Director, Sydney Business
Chamber
Stephen Found, Managing Director, The Capitol Theatre
Catherine Gallagher, Acting Executive Director Marketing &
Events, SHFA
Victor Gaspar, Group General Manager, IPOH Pty Ltd
Chris Gough, Director, Visit Sydney, Tourism NSW
Andy Hedges, Director Shopping Centre Management & Marketing,
Westfield Group
Professor Ken Maher, Executive Chairman, Hassell
Carol Mills, Director General, Communities NSW
Margie Osmond, Chief Executive Officer, Australian National
Retailers Association
Liane Rossler, Dinosaur Designs
Angela Vithoulkas, Director, Vivo Café Group
Benjamin Webster, Regional Manager, Sydney CBD, David Jones
Ltd
Les Wielinga, Director General, Transport NSW
Media Contacts: Maya Catsanis 02 9265 9553, 0409 045425
Andrew Parkinson (Minister McKay) 0447 202 091
Maya Catsanis
Media and Communications
City of Sydney
Tel:
02 9265 9553
Mob: 0409 045 425
mcatsanis@cityofsydney..nsw.gov.au
=====================================
Dear
Lord Mayor,
I was greatly disheartened to learn that the City of Sydney
has convened a new retail advisory panel comprised solely
of large CBD corporate interests including Westfield, Australian
National Retailers Association, David Jones, IPOH and Dymocks.
The recent opening of a massive billion dollar shopping mall
in the city centre poses a grave and serious threat to small
businesses throughout the City’s village precincts.
In order to recoup its investment into the Pitt Street mall,
the retail giant will seek to suck even more trade from the
surrounding precincts at the expense of small, independent
retailers around the City fringe, thus posing a significant
threat to the lifeblood of the City’s unique, village
high streets.
Why isn’t the Lord Mayor convening a Small Business
Advisory Group instead? Why is the City convening a retail
panel made up solely of traders from the big end of town?
Shouldn't she be representing the interests of the little
guy? Our unique urban villages are under threat. Small businesses
from Oxford Street to Glebe Point Road are doing it tough.
Not long ago, Glebe was a thriving urban enclave chock-a-block
full of small shops offering original, non homogenised goods
and services. Nowadays the Broadway Shopping Centre generates
more revenue than the whole of Glebe. Across town, Oxford
Street’s daytime economy has been sucked dry by Westfield
Bondi Junction. And now with the opening of the Pitt Street
mega mall, even more small retail businesses on all sides
of the CBD are under threat. Many will go out of business
because of Westfield -- which delivers the same sanitised
corporate consumer culture as chain franchise outlets all
around the globe. If the Lord Mayor were to join me on a tour
of San Francisco, I trust she wouldn’t want to visit
the new Westfield on Market Street.
Tourists to a global city seek authentic urban experiences,
not identikit retail outlets in multi story mega malls. The
claim that putting resources into advancing the interests
of major retailers will in anyway support tourism is misguided
and ill informed. Retail chain stores in mega malls in downtown
City centres are not draw cards for global tourism. Having
sat on the Sydney Reference Group for Tourism NSW for a year,
I can tell you that most major tourism operators agree that
the death of the City’s authentic village precincts
is one of the reasons global tourists are not spending time
or money in Sydney. Sydney’s tourism numbers are substantially
down in large part because of the Westfield juggernaut. International
tourists used to spend three days in Sydney, now they spend
less than a day and a half before they fly off to Melbourne
or Queensland to find an authentic Australian experience.
Rather than support Westfield as it seeks to drain money from
the surrounding precincts, the Lord Mayor should vigorously
support, champion and celebrate the few remaining small businesses
that create a unique urban village in what remains of Darlinghurst,
Newtown and Glebe. The Lord Mayor is urged to immediately
convene a Small Business Advisory Group to address the faltering
local retail environment. The City’s business support
grants and economic development unit are all a start, but
the Lord Mayor cannot afford to assume the City’s struggling
village precincts are being looked after; not when Westfield
has opened a billion dollar mega mall in the heart of the
City. Residents and workers take pride in living in villages
with some of the world’s best cafes, shops and high
streets in the world. International tourists are attracted
to a global city that has its own unique charm and authentic
identity. Surely the Lord Mayor does not wish to preside over
a City that shifts more and more retail trade into Westfield
and surrounds. By not convening a Small Business Advisory
Group at the same time that she has convened a group for mega
retail interests, she is sending the wrong message at the
wrong time.
Lawrence Gibbons
President
Pyrmont Ultimo Chamber of Commerce
2010 Darlinghurst / Surry Hills Business Partnership
=========================================
Well
said.
Clover, this is a short sighted vote grabbing insult to the
City’s City of Villages concept
Regards
B. N.
=========================================
Hi Monica
How
about putting strip retail on an equal footing with shopping
centres for once and reprogramming the parking meters to make
the first three hours FREE?
Regards
S. T.
=========================================
Four
weeks ago at the City East community meeting (Heffron Hall),
in front of 100 people, the City of Sydney CEO promised a
workshop for small business in our (Lower Oxford Street) area.
This was in response to me having pointed out that a) we had
been asking for one for two years and b) council had not come
back to speak to businesses in the area since the 24 million
dollar footpath went through six years ago. It was also indicated
that this should go ahead post-haste.
We
have since heard nothing about this except for being told
by the Economic Development Officer that this would now be
rolled up into the existing Cultural Quarter framework: not
what we asked for; not what we were promised!
We
are still waiting to be contacted, but it’s painfully
obvious from this new advisory panel where the Lord Mayor's
heart lies, and it is not in her villages.
Stephan
Györy
0414 581 919
========================================
From Monica Barone. City of Sydney Council CEO:
Hi
I have spoken to staff and they confirm they are working on
a workshop and will be in touch. However we think it would
be hard to have this workshop before Christmas.
Also - we do have a small business representative on the retail
panel.
thanks
m
Lisa and Jan pls file and Jan pls can I have an update re
this forum and can you pls set a date soon and advise Stephan
and others
========================================
Monica, with all due respect one appointment of a CBD based
operator of cafes, no matter how lovely the individual is,
to a panel carrying such a obvious leaning towards large corporate
based interests does not representation of small character
based business in the villages make.
When
Lawrence and myself asked the Minister for Tourism last year
how the Government saw the importance of the Villages or Precincts
outside of the CBD, and were advised they were 'vital' to
the presentation of this city from both a tourism and retail
perspective, it seems most unusual no person or body that
has immediate and hands on retail experience and knowledge
of what is happening in the Villages has been included and
even more unusual there is little reference to the Villages/Precincts
in the press release(s).
This
is especially unusual given:
• A Lord Mayors Advisory Group for the Oxford Street
precinct that was in existence as a feedback point on these
exact issues was disbanded in 2005/6
• The marketing of Sydney as a destination has been
under the City of Villages banner for sometime now - the CBD
is just one of those villages is it not?
• The much anticipated Economic Development Strategy
initially due December 2008 that would guide this discussion
has now been postponed to 2011/12 (http://www.cityofsydney..nsw.gov.au/Business/CityEconomy/EconomicDevelopmentStrategy.asp)
AND
• That Sustainable Sydney 2030 has Vibrant Economies
and Local Villages as one of it's CORE outcomes (http://www.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/2030/theplan/)
To create an Advisory Panel that seems to have the make-up
that will ensure the CBD is working in isolation to the villages
seems to be a very unusual and regressive strategy that would
be quite disruptive to all of the above goals.
Given
it has been quite a shock that such a group materialises with
minimal discussion and with such perceived clout would it
be possible to provide us all with an overview of the Terms
of Reference, defined outcomes and suggested time lines/delivery
for this Retail Advisory Panel.
It
would be very interesting to know who this eminent panel will
be advising, what they will be advising about, what is the
intent or outcomes, with what authority, how they are going
to engage with other businesses in the City, if there is any
larger public or business inclusion/consultation period intended,
what the time lines are and what budget allocations they may
have.
I
am aware that Council is meeting today so appreciate you will
be most busy but given the importance of this could you please
advise when you would be able to provide the above information.
Many
thanks,
Andrew
Duckmanton
=====================================
Dear Monica,
The
Three Saints Square Project recognises the CoS’s efforts
in establishing a Retail Advisory Panel (as per the CoS press
release below) as the Lord Mayor said “to identify and
create opportunities for the retail sector to capitalise on
major events and tourism campaigns” with the advice
of panel members including Westfield, Transport NSW, Australian
National Retailers Association, David Jones, IPOH, Dymocks
and Tourism NSW.
We
believe that small business is very important, particularly
in regards to the survival and success of high streets and
cross streets in the villages.
Therefore
we support the aspects of the discussion in the community
(below) which request
1) More appropriate Small Business and Village representation
on the Retail Advisory Panel to provide a better balance between
big and small business and to ensure that the interests of
small business and the villages are adequately addressed,
&
2) The establishment a Small Business Advisory Panel to focus
specifically on CoS policies and how they impact small businesses,
to ensure that CoS policies provide an environment which encouraged
the establishment, sustainability and growth of small businesses.
Yours Sincerely,
Sue Ritchie
Convenor
Three Saints Square Project.
|
11/05/2010
|
This
piece from the local newspaper mentions a council spokesman,
but not by name. Hopefully the promises of this nameless beaurocrat
is worth the electrons its printed in:
http://sxnews.gaynewsnetwork.com.au/news/visionless-inept-frustrating-006918.html
=====================================
Visionless,
inept, frustrating’
WRITTEN BY BRENDAN BOLGER | 08 MARCH 2010
The
City of Sydney Council has been sharply criticised for its
lack of consultation with business owners along Oxford Street
which has contributed to the demise of the “gay iconic
strip”.
Local
resident, “caretaker” vice-president of the Darlinghurst
Business Partnership (DBP) and co-business owner of The Record
Store Stephan Györy said Council has a “habit of
planning for us and consulting at us”.
The
DBP said it encouraged Council to purchase the vacant T2 premises
on Taylor Square, which it congratulated for preventing it
becoming another night time venue on the strip, but said it
was now concerned that Council will “arbitrarily”
decide what was needed at the site.
Council
announced in January that its purchase of the “notorious”
T2 nightclub would pave the way for “community-based
options” including a bicycle shop and repair centre,
a cafe, a tour company and a place for cycle groups to meet.
It
said in a statement that a local survey from June 2008 found
locals wanted less nightclubs, pubs and clubs but wanted more
cafes, restaurants and local services.
Györy
said however that Council’s creation of the Oxford Street
Cultural Quarter under its Sustainable Sydney 2030 plan had
placed “layers and layers of bureaucracy between [commercial
interests] and the Council”.
He
wrote to Council in February to “urge” they commence
community consultations for input into “possible additional
uses” at the site, but said he has since been ignored.
In
his letter, Györy suggested Council changes the community
consultation format from public forums and adapt to new technologies.
“For
what would surely be far less than the combined financial
and time costs of a physical process, you could very simply
conduct an online poll,” he wrote, adding that “suggestions”
could be included in the poll.
Györy
told SX the DBP had also requested an independent facilitator
if the consultations were to continue in a forum format, but
were flatly refused.
“They
just won’t have meetings they can’t control,”
he said.
He
added that since the multi-million dollar Oxford Street “upgrade”,
Council has not once consulted with business owners about
the effect the infrastructure changes have had on the entire
environment.
DBP
caretaker president Andrew Duckmanton said the DBP had originally
mooted the cycling centre plan, but also suggested that community
organisations have access to the top floor and that the post
office be moved back into central Darlinghurst to revitalise
the area.
“They
are visionless, inept and frustrating,” he said and
showed “a lack of support for the daytime economy”.
He
said due to the lack of a clear vision for Lower Oxford Street,
which he said Council claimed has an economic impact of $540
million per annum, it had left the commercial aspect of the
area in an “unsure environment”.
“Even
the gay identity is not really grounded,” he said.
“How
can it work if the community does not support it, the community
is there on the ground every day. We’ve become insular
as a community. Somehow this has got to change,” Duckmanton
said.
A
Council spokesperson said the Oxford Street Cultural Quarter
Action Plan was a response to locals who requested that Council
build on the area’s strengths.
“Oxford
Street and its vicinity have long been appreciated as a creative
and cultural centre both locally and internationally …
a rich cultural experience for residents and visitors,”
she said.
Consultations
will be continued with the community in 2010 to develop a
deliverable action plan and will be informed by “interviews,
workshops, formal consultations and research,” she said.
Meanwhile,
Taylor Square could hold regular farmers’ markets comprising
44 stalls that would mainly sell organic produce and “artisan”
food products but would also offer cooking demonstrations
from local chefs and education resources for sustainable urban
living.
Sydney
City Council has received a proposal from Sydney Sustainable
Markets Inc to commence running the markets each Saturday
from 17 April between 8am-1pm for the next 12 months, excluding
public holidays
|
| |
|
16/03/2010
|
The
letter below was sent to all City of Sydney Councillors (15/02/10)
as well as various council staff and media. To date I have not
received a response from council (except an acknowledgement
of receipt from one Councillor), but the media have been very
interested in the seeming arrogance of this council.
As far as I can make out, Clover Moore and her council have
fully abandoned Lower Oxford Street and are happy to let the
market dictate its future. It
is already doing this, as you can tell from the appearance
of yet another convenience store next to the Colombian Hotel.
How this 1500 people strong multimillion dollar entity (CoS)
cannot see the link between our arguments and their alcohol
and violence problem, is hard to comprehend. They have themselves
acknowledged the problems by supporting the Liquor License
freeze and 2am lockout.
One
can only put it down to the fact that Clover will not go within
1000 yards of anything that smells of risk. Parks are nice
and safe, so she keeps making them. (Note: I am not against
parks and acknowledge the necessity of public domain upgrades)
On
questioning them, council will insist that they are doing
lots for Oxford Street. Let's see them hold a community meeting
in the area and put that proposition to the local community.
But ho, they also insist they have meetings for the area,
down in Surry Hills and up in Potts Point and when you tell
them they are failing to communicate with this community,
they insists they are not, failing to see the extreme irony
in that proposition.
NB:
There has not been a community meeting in the Lower Oxford
Street area since the conclusion of the Gateway Project five
years ago. When one council staff member was presented with
this fact she blithely replied that she thought no one would
come.
======================================
Councillors & CEO
Firstly,
a hearty thanks for your purchase of the T2 building at Taylor
Square. It is good to know that you have begun to respond
to our pleas for active management of the area.
To
give a bit of context to this email, the suggestion to create
a bicycle hub at Taylor Square, which originally came from
Andrew Duckmanton of the DBP, was only one part of a broader
strategy to “Reclaim the Square”, a concept CEO
Monica Barone verbally signed off on at one of our meetings*
with her late 2009.
I
now write to urge you to consult with the community on possible
additional uses for these premises.
A
bike hub may attract some people over time, but things like
a council one stop shop or post shop would attract a lot of
people right away and it is vital for the long term rehabilitation
of Taylor Square that it is of use to the largest possible
cross-section of the community.
I
don’t need to remind you that 2010 is possibly the only
postcode in Sydney surrounded by post offices, but containing
none. Odd for an area with ¾ billion dollar/year economy
and that is home to 25,000 residents.
I
would also like to suggest that community consultation does
not need to follow the model you currently adhere too. For
what would surely be far less than the combined financial
and time costs of a physical process, you could very simply
conduct an online poll, supported by a direct mail campaign
to mop up the non-internet users. Short of that, you already
have a very comprehensive email list of community (residents
& business) stakeholders.
Just
take a poll on the uses you, and we, currently have proposed,
as well as providing an fields for additional suggestions.
I
was going to wait to bring this up at the Lower Oxford Street
and Surrounds [OXLO] community meeting that you are planning
for the area, but have decided that the matter is too urgent
to leave lying about.
Two
other small matters:
1) It seems that in your renovation of 118 Oxford Street you
have installed track lighting instead of low energy bulbs.
2) Seeing as how you actively discourage car use in this city,
could you please provide e-waste recycling facilities at your
one stop shops and also, instead of having a half-yearly stationary
collection day in Pyrmont, perhaps you should consider a year
round, roving one, like the breast screening bus, just park
it in 52 different places a year, a week at a time.
Thank you for your time
Stephan Györy
|
08/02/2010
|
During
the course of the second half of 2009 I, Stephan Gyory with
Andrew Duckmanton and Marc Altshuler attended 3-4 meetings with
the CEO of City of Sydney council [CoS], Monica Barone and Alan
Cardogan and Jan Campbell both also of CoS. During these meetings
the following interesting things occurred:
1) Alan Cardogan, onew of the architects of the Sydney2030 Document,
admitted that council did not have a vision for its villages.
*ahem*
2) Monica promised that Lower Oxford Street & Surrounds
(a $540,000,000.00/year economy, as per their own figures) would
be officially recognised as a precinct
in its own right, distinct from Paddintgon, Surry Hills
(around the Clock) and Darlinghurst (around Darlinghurst Road).
NB: WAITING FOR THIS TO HAPPEN.
3) At the last meeting, I pointed out that in the five years
since council spent $24,000,000.00 on the Oxford Street upgrade,
they had never once returned to the area to see 'how things
went'. That's right, five years, not one community meeting (point
being that the Inner
East and City East meetings do not cover Oxford Street).
Stunningly, they said, yes, okay, thats a great idea, we can
do that next year (2010). You would have thought that they might
have thought of this on their own, but no, it took meetings
with the CEO for this idea to happen, you'd think one of their
1500 paid staff might have dreamed this up. NB: WAITING FOR
THIS TO HAPPEN.
4) At one of these meetings, Andrew Duckmanton suggested that
T2 at Taylor Square be bought and turned into a cycle hub for
council's new $220,000,000.00 bicycle network (NB: This use
was only one of many suggested 'combined uses' with the hope
of reclaiming Taylor Square for the community - post shop, police
shop front, council one stop shop to name a few).
But it was the bike hub idea that fit in with their 2030 plan
(a plan that was made for us, not with us - oh yes, typically,
the bureaucrats planned for us and then consulted at us - nothing
new here) and so, they did buy it, only thing is, when Andrew
met with Clover, she didn't even know it was his idea.
The point here is not one of appropriation of ideas (that is
what ideas are for) but the fact that the Lord Mayor was not
aware of the contribution of the local community. If this is
the case, then how can she possibly value it?
|
12/10/2009
|
Yet
another piece, you would think that the various levels of
government would be interested in getting together with the
local community (residents & businesses) and tap their
local knowledge for suggestions on how to solve this problem.
But no, they are too busy off being ineffective and covering
their asses.
Daily
Telegraph Article
Excerpt: "LATE-night revellers have turned Oxford St
into a dangerous chicken run, risking their lives and forcing
cars to swerve and dodge.
Some
people walk, some run - others just put their hand up to halt
oncoming cars and hope for the best. |
31/8/2009
|
excerpt:
"I don’t think Oxford Street caters well to anyone,”
says Damien Eames, head of Marketing at New Mardi Gras. “I
rarely go there anymore… Sydney’s mix of planning
controls and liquor licensing restrictions means there are
very few high intensity night life districts. There are only
so many venues that can be crammed into Kings Cross, Oxford
Street and George Street. The market isn’t really that
competitive and as a result venues can treat their customers
as cattle."
http://www.samesame.com.au/features/4436/Has-Sydney-Fallen-Asleep.htm
|
24/8/2009
|
It's
almost laughable how many people are
saying the same thing about Public Transport in Sydney with
NO ONE at the top listening.
This is our comment on the Sydney Morning Herald piece linked
to above:
"Integrated ticketing and PT in Sydney is a great idea,
but to refer to it as radical is disingenuous to say the least.
This has been on the cards for years (some might say 100 years)
but every time a combination of wowsers and visionless politicians
scuttle things. For
those of you outside Sydney, bear in mind that this city generates
8% of GDP and gets rorted by the feds on GST as well. If we
don’t get our PT system sorted out A.S.A.P. Sydney will
continue to be a global laughing stock among other world cities:
nothing but a pretty harbour and a cold bleak CBD." |
16/7/2009
|
Council
recently held their bi-yearly community meetings: June 30
for Surry Hills (at the new Library) and July 9 for Darlinghurst
(at the Rex Centre Potts Point). Needless to say there was
little to no discussion of Oxford Street as it is so far away
from both these venues (bike lanes on Bourke Street and the
311 bus and were the hot ticket items - both issues local
to the immediate surrounds).
2 years ago we pointed out that the LAPs (Local Action Plans)
reinforced the concept of Oxford Street as boundary and therefore
relegated it to the bureaucratic netherworld. We were assured
the new LAP's (the Activity Hubs of Sustainable Sydney 2030)
would address this issue.
They
have not.
This
is no surprise and one can only assume that the entire council
is either completely incompetent or have some kind of directive
to ignore Lower Oxford Street and let it rot.
One can only wonder. |
23/6/2009
|
Comment
from Michael:
Oxford started to die 20 years ago when increasing rents forced
most people
to move away from Darlinghurst
The
2am lockout was the last nail in the coffin ... lets face
it .. its now
a hassle to go out anywhere near Oxford St on weekends these
days.. no
parking and no cabs at 2:30am! (and busses on weekends don't
come often
enough)
people
don't go out there by themselves any more (when that happens
you know
its dead!)
I
don't know if it can be saved now without some serious changes
in
everything from licensing to transport to freedom to move
between clubs.
|
19/6/2009
|
See
here our submissions on the City
of Sydney's DRAFT Corporate plan. As you can see, there are
serious grounds for concern regarding the City's management
far beyond the confines of Lower Oxford Street, as pointed
out rather elegantly in the sydney
morning herald article below.
|
| 18/6/2009
|
A
excerpt from an article in the English Publication Monocle.
As you can see, the problems we have outlined are just part
of a far larger picture.
"Sydney,
says Monocle, may be blessed by nature, have an enviable lifestyle
and a thriving restaurant scene which shows Europe the meaning
of service. But its cultural life is a bit patchy and it is
cursed by an incompetent council that stymies all opportunities
that sweep into the city.
Melbourne
on the other hand nurtures its entrepreneurial brands, has
a thriving literary and cultural life, values its distinct
neighbourhoods and exudes self confidence. It is let down
only by its sprawl and buckling train network that has staff
handing icecreams out to par boiled passengers."
Please do not take this to mean we hate Sydney and Love Melbourne.
We don’t buy into that rival city garbage. This is merely
meant to serve as another ‘external’ example of
our point. That this city is run by people who at best, have
their eyes and ears firmly shut…
|
| 11/6/2009
|
A brutally honest piece from the Sydney
Morning Herald:
-------------------
Emerald city has lost its soul, not just its sparkle
Sydney
is not a lovely place in winter. The CBD is a biting wind
tunnel, Frank Sartor's granite footpaths are stained with
the grease from spilled milkshakes, the sun is thin, the faces
chapped and there's a pervading pong of rotten cooking oil
and urine.
You've
more chance of being crippled for life by a wild-eyed skateboarder
than you have of finding a delicious and inexpensive meal
after 2.30 in the afternoon. In fact, you can walk the entire
length of the city from Central to Circular Quay on some thoroughfares
and find nothing other than 1950-style cafes doing ham and
cheese on toast.
Forget
all the "Emerald City" nonsense, to borrow a line
from someone I can't remember; Sydney makes Dallas look like
Paris.
Here's
another line, from the late great French cultural figure and
politician, Andre Malraux. In Paris, he said, the city controls
the developers. The developers do not control the city. Naturally
he said it in French, so it sounded so much better.
Sydney's
what you get when the developers run the place. Badly designed,
cheaply finished buildings. You can count on the fingers of
one, maybe one-and-a-half, hands buildings constructed in
the CBD in the last 50 years where aesthetics were given at
least an even break with the money. The big institutions,
particularly the banks and Telstra, have given us some shockers.
Still,
we're used to shockers: the Cahill Expressway and the monorail
have helped deaden our response to whatever fresh hell is
around the corner. My personal favourites are the overhead
footways criss-crossing the city, like vast vacuum tubes sucking
consumers from one shopping extravaganza to another. If ever
there was a determined piece of civic uglification it is the
overhead pedestrian tunnel - the brute force of commerce crushing
charm.
The
old Carlton brewery site on Broadway, if work ever recommences,
will be massively overdeveloped - as will the Barangaroo project.
Opportunity after opportunity is missed - Darling Harbour
has the unmistakable aura of a tourist clip joint and that
other great promise, Pyrmont, is filled with apartments designed
for dwarfs.
Every
time an area requiring sensitive management comes on the horizon
a special planning committee filled with party hacks, mates,
real estaters and "planners" gets to work to eviscerate
the promise of something uplifting.
Of
course, there's the dazzle of the harbour and one or two incredible
structures. You can get the odd good Thai dinner in the suburbs
and there's the odd terrific new development (witness the
new community centre in Crown Street, Surry Hills).
But
what's happened to the soul of Sydney? The fact that the place
is crawling with merchant bankers doesn't do much for a soul,
but the real drag on the spirit has to be sheeted home to
the politicians, who at best are ordinary and at worse dubious.
And
that's what the city has become - ordinary and dubious.
There's
no leader whoever spruiks the spirited talk of the greatness
of city life and urban design. You have to go back 30 or more
years to the days of the Department of Urban and Regional
Development and Tom Uren to recall any government that had
a passing thought about urbanity.
It
was never on Howard's radar; however, the Ruddites have just
established something called the Major Cities Unit, which
exists in the Office of the Infrastructure Co-ordinator, the
outfit charged with "prioritising billions of dollars
in infrastructure investment".
But,
when you look at the visionless political oiks of NSW, night
after night on the box, you just know we haven't got a hope.
It makes you want to see again that little jumping jack Leo
Port, the former lord mayor of Sydney, who at least had some
energy and always seemed to be rolling out plans and poring
over models for improvements and beautification.
Today
there's political paralysis. A few years ago the Government
had an opportunity to tear down the Cahill Expressway, but
was frozen by the thought that there'd be a backlash from
the whingers in the bush if a red cent was spent doing something
half-decent for Sydney.
Still,
the great beer-barn developments in places such as Kings Cross
get waved through the development machine, including the Land
and Environment Court, while the small bars are stymied in
red tape. Try and get a civilised drink out of sight of a
poker machine, just keep trying.
John
O'Neill, the chairman of Events NSW, had a piece on these
pages on Monday. My pulse quickened as he wrote that the Business
Council and a whole pile of other worthies think it's about
time something was done about the city and the state. "Something
radical, a bit out of left field," he teased. This exciting
bit of boldness turned out to be "Brand Sydney",
yet another marketing exercise, or putting lipstick on the
pig. Apparently "Vivid Sydney", a winter wonderland
cultural event, is part of the brand. All I noticed was that
the Opera House was lit up.
Yet,
Sydney always manages to trick its way into getting listed
as an incredibly desirable place to live. It's equal eighth
on The Economist's latest "liveability ranking".
Last year in something called the annual Anholt City Brands
Index it came first. Don't believe it.
On
second thoughts that's a measure of branding. O'Neill's people
are doing well. Shame about our heart and soul.
justinian@lawpress.com.
|
15/4/2009
|
It
is truly disheartening to spend years of your lives as volunteers
in an endeavour to promote the wellbeing of the community within
which you live, only to have it continually thrown back in your
face. 18 months ago we came up with a plan to promote the Inner
East of Sydney (a half billion dollar economy and alternate
arts and culture Sydney CBD) and presented this plan to the
City of Sydney council executive. To this day nothing has happened.
After completing workshops
and attending meetings and dotting all the T’s and I’s
we were asked to and coming up with a plan, and presenting
the plan, the Inner East still languishes as the undiscovered
country to the East of the Harbour bridge and the Opera House
– It’s just through Hyde Park, and the rest of
it doesn't all look like South Oxford Street– honestly!
But really, you can truly
understand how someone who spent 36 hours in transit to get
to Sydney from the Northern Hemisphere, might end up in Darling
Harbour, shrug, sigh ‘is this it’ and never return.
In a time when Sydney needs
every competitive angle it can get to attract new visitors,
our Lord Mayor thinks it’s more important to clean up
a train station, which just happens to be in an area where
lots of residents don’t like their train station (see
below), and told her so during the last election campaign.
Oxford Street is threatening
to go postal, the business community around it has been pointing
out for years that by supporting the day time traders and
arts and culture community, we could arrest this slide into
a frenzy of night time exchanges of body fluids. Admittedly,
we received two grants worth $97,000.00 with which we did
the research to discover that world’s best practice
in destination marketing/area management would cost about
3 million. But this is where it stopped.
We did what we were asked
to do, outlined the problem, suggested solutions and are stuck
where we were 18 months ago.
One can only assume that they
don’t particularly care. Or perhaps their vote is safe
in this neighbourhood because the only resident’s groups
(the people who are listened to in the running of Sydney)
that exist in this area are at odds with each other and don’t
speak with a united voice.
Clover,
we implore you to recognise the value of the Inner East and
be our champion. Help us access state and federal funds. Take
charge of Oxford Street! Help us promote the Inner east, with
its huge economy, to the rest of the State, Country and World.
Help us show that Sydney is more than just a bridge and a
harbour.
Stop the meetings. Show the consultants the door, and take
some action! PLEASE!
------------------------------------------
This rant was inspired by the following article:
http://sydney-central.whereilive.com.au/news/story/newtown-station-urban-blight-lord-mayor/
Newtown
station is an urban blight with vacant shopfronts and big
problems with disability access, Lord Mayor Clover Moore has
said.
In a rant against the station, in the heart of Newtown, Cr
Moore said Town Hall would work with the State Government
to try and improve the state of the busy transport hub.
Cr Moore has asked City of Sydney CEO Monica Barone to convene
a working group of representatives from the council and State
Government to work on the problem.
She said a recent meeting with State representatives had identified
Newtown as an important hub.
``There is a problem with vacant shopfronts,’’
Cr Moore said.
``Newtown station is an urban and visual blight. Undoubtedly
there are [also] disability access issues around the station'
|
19/2/2009
|
At
the end of last year there was some kafuffle at council regarding
newsstands and the fact that MX had paid heaps of cash to hand
out their papers. During this debate the issue of disability
access came up in the context that news paper stands for all
free publications would impair access.
It was at this stage that
we emailed the entire mailing list, comprising the Lord Mayor,
CoS Councillors and long list of Concerned Stakeholders about
the apparent incongruity of invoking disabled access when
the ‘disability access’ ball was dropped so badly
by council on the 2006 of Oxford Square
upgrade.
After
having brought this up with numerous council people on numerous
occasions over the course of two years, it was only after
this email bomb that the bollards were quietly removed. We
post here the Lord Mayor’s response to out initial letter
and our reply to it, sent today.
The exchange speaks for itself.
|
| 30/1/2009
|
On
the 15th of December 2008 we sent an email
to Councillor John McInerney asking whether Clover’s
Independent team would consider championing the ‘remaking’
of Oxford Street in the way that they were Albion and Crown.
We have, as of this date, not received a reply.
|
13/12/2008
|
The
City of Sydney Planning
Development and Transport Committee meeting on Monday
the 8th Dec 2008 and unanimously supported Independent Councillor
John McInerney's amendment to pursue returning Foveaux and
Albion Streets to two-way traffic. The Reason given was that
the current one-way arrangement creates freeway conditions
that encourage speed, undermine pedestrian safety and divide
the Surry Hills village.
We strongly support this kind of thinking
and encourage City of Sydney council to consider Oxford Street
in their dealings with the RTA.
|
4/12/2008
|
Well
done, I look forward to watching the progress of the campaign
to save Oxford St.
|
16/11/2008
|
Really
good work from the DBP. I hope the people in council take
the time to read it and re-invigorate the strip.
|
| 16/11/2008
|
Hi.Yes
\"Bring Back the Boulevard\"!
Its great to see business supporting changes.
All best |
| |
|
| |
|
|
site
designed, built, written & maintained by Stephan Gyory__
|