|
|
This
site was built October/November 2008. It has two main purposes.
The first is to present the issues. The second is to serve as a
timeline.
| 11/05/2010
|
This
piece from the local newspaper mentions a council spokesman,
but not by name. Hopefully the promises of this nameless beaurocrat
is worth the electrons its printed in:
http://sxnews.gaynewsnetwork.com.au/news/visionless-inept-frustrating-006918.html
==========================
Visionless,
inept, frustrating’
WRITTEN BY BRENDAN BOLGER | 08 MARCH 2010
The
City of Sydney Council has been sharply criticised for its
lack of consultation with business owners along Oxford Street
which has contributed to the demise of the “gay iconic
strip”.
Local
resident, “caretaker” vice-president of the Darlinghurst
Business Partnership (DBP) and co-business owner of The Record
Store Stephan Györy said Council has a “habit of
planning for us and consulting at us”.
The
DBP said it encouraged Council to purchase the vacant T2 premises
on Taylor Square, which it congratulated for preventing it
becoming another night time venue on the strip, but said it
was now concerned that Council will “arbitrarily”
decide what was needed at the site.
Council
announced in January that its purchase of the “notorious”
T2 nightclub would pave the way for “community-based
options” including a bicycle shop and repair centre,
a cafe, a tour company and a place for cycle groups to meet.
It
said in a statement that a local survey from June 2008 found
locals wanted less nightclubs, pubs and clubs but wanted more
cafes, restaurants and local services.
Györy
said however that Council’s creation of the Oxford Street
Cultural Quarter under its Sustainable Sydney 2030 plan had
placed “layers and layers of bureaucracy between [commercial
interests] and the Council”.
He
wrote to Council in February to “urge” they commence
community consultations for input into “possible additional
uses” at the site, but said he has since been ignored.
In
his letter, Györy suggested Council changes the community
consultation format from public forums and adapt to new technologies.
“For
what would surely be far less than the combined financial
and time costs of a physical process, you could very simply
conduct an online poll,” he wrote, adding that “suggestions”
could be included in the poll.
Györy
told SX the DBP had also requested an independent facilitator
if the consultations were to continue in a forum format, but
were flatly refused.
“They
just won’t have meetings they can’t control,”
he said.
He
added that since the multi-million dollar Oxford Street “upgrade”,
Council has not once consulted with business owners about
the effect the infrastructure changes have had on the entire
environment.
DBP
caretaker president Andrew Duckmanton said the DBP had originally
mooted the cycling centre plan, but also suggested that community
organisations have access to the top floor and that the post
office be moved back into central Darlinghurst to revitalise
the area.
“They
are visionless, inept and frustrating,” he said and
showed “a lack of support for the daytime economy”.
He
said due to the lack of a clear vision for Lower Oxford Street,
which he said Council claimed has an economic impact of $540
million per annum, it had left the commercial aspect of the
area in an “unsure environment”.
“Even
the gay identity is not really grounded,” he said.
“How
can it work if the community does not support it, the community
is there on the ground every day. We’ve become insular
as a community. Somehow this has got to change,” Duckmanton
said.
A
Council spokesperson said the Oxford Street Cultural Quarter
Action Plan was a response to locals who requested that Council
build on the area’s strengths.
“Oxford
Street and its vicinity have long been appreciated as a creative
and cultural centre both locally and internationally …
a rich cultural experience for residents and visitors,”
she said.
Consultations
will be continued with the community in 2010 to develop a
deliverable action plan and will be informed by “interviews,
workshops, formal consultations and research,” she said.
Meanwhile,
Taylor Square could hold regular farmers’ markets comprising
44 stalls that would mainly sell organic produce and “artisan”
food products but would also offer cooking demonstrations
from local chefs and education resources for sustainable urban
living.
Sydney
City Council has received a proposal from Sydney Sustainable
Markets Inc to commence running the markets each Saturday
from 17 April between 8am-1pm for the next 12 months, excluding
public holidays
|
16/03/2010
|
The
letter below was sent to all City of Sydney Councillors (15/02/10)
as well as various council staff and media. To date I have not
received a response from council (except an acknowledgement
of receipt from one Councillor), but the media have been very
interested in the seeming arrogance of this council.
As far as I can make out, Clover Moore and her council have
fully abandoned Lower Oxford Street and are happy to let the
market dictate its future. It
is already doing this, as you can tell from the appearance
of yet another convenience store next to the Colombian Hotel.
How this 1500 people strong multimillion dollar entity (CoS)
cannot see the link between our arguments and their alcohol
and violence problem, is hard to comprehend. They have themselves
acknowledged the problems by supporting the Liquor License
freeze and 2am lockout.
One
can only put it down to the fact that Clover will not go within
1000 yards of anything that smells of risk. Parks are nice
and safe, so she keeps making them. (Note: I am not against
parks and acknowledge the necessity of public domain upgrades)
On
questioning them, council will insist that they are doing
lots for Oxford Street. Let's see them hold a community meeting
in the area and put that proposition to the local community.
But ho, they also insist they have meetings for the area,
down in Surry Hills and up in Potts Point and when you tell
them they are failing to communicate with this community,
they insists they are not, failing to see the extreme irony
in that proposition.
NB:
There has not been a community meeting in the Lower Oxford
Street area since the conclusion of the Gateway Project five
years ago. When one council staff member was presented with
this fact she blithely replied that she thought no one would
come.
======================================
Councillors & CEO
Firstly,
a hearty thanks for your purchase of the T2 building at Taylor
Square. It is good to know that you have begun to respond
to our pleas for active management of the area.
To
give a bit of context to this email, the suggestion to create
a bicycle hub at Taylor Square, which originally came from
Andrew Duckmanton of the DBP, was only one part of a broader
strategy to “Reclaim the Square”, a concept CEO
Monica Barone verbally signed off on at one of our meetings*
with her late 2009.
I
now write to urge you to consult with the community on possible
additional uses for these premises.
A
bike hub may attract some people over time, but things like
a council one stop shop or post shop would attract a lot of
people right away and it is vital for the long term rehabilitation
of Taylor Square that it is of use to the largest possible
cross-section of the community.
I
don’t need to remind you that 2010 is possibly the only
postcode in Sydney surrounded by post offices, but containing
none. Odd for an area with ¾ billion dollar/year economy
and that is home to 25,000 residents.
I
would also like to suggest that community consultation does
not need to follow the model you currently adhere too. For
what would surely be far less than the combined financial
and time costs of a physical process, you could very simply
conduct an online poll, supported by a direct mail campaign
to mop up the non-internet users. Short of that, you already
have a very comprehensive email list of community (residents
& business) stakeholders.
Just
take a poll on the uses you, and we, currently have proposed,
as well as providing an fields for additional suggestions.
I
was going to wait to bring this up at the Lower Oxford Street
and Surrounds [OXLO] community meeting that you are planning
for the area, but have decided that the matter is too urgent
to leave lying about.
Two
other small matters:
1) It seems that in your renovation of 118 Oxford Street you
have installed track lighting instead of low energy bulbs.
2) Seeing as how you actively discourage car use in this city,
could you please provide e-waste recycling facilities at your
one stop shops and also, instead of having a half-yearly stationary
collection day in Pyrmont, perhaps you should consider a year
round, roving one, like the breast screening bus, just park
it in 52 different places a year, a week at a time.
Thank you for your time
Stephan Györy
|
08/02/2010
|
During
the course of the second half of 2009 I, Stephan Gyory with
Andrew Duckmanton and Marc Altshuler attended 3-4 meetings with
the CEO of City of Sydney council [CoS], Monica Barone and Alan
Cardogan and Jan Campbell both also of CoS. During these meetings
the following interesting things occurred:
1) Alan Cardogan, onew of the architects of the Sydney2030 Document,
admitted that council did not have a vision for its villages.
*ahem*
2) Monica promised that Lower Oxford Street & Surrounds
(a $540,000,000.00/year economy, as per their own figures) would
be officially recognised as a precinct
in its own right, distinct from Paddintgon, Surry Hills
(around the Clock) and Darlinghurst (around Darlinghurst Road).
NB: WAITING FOR THIS TO HAPPEN.
3) At the last meeting, I pointed out that in the five years
since council spent $24,000,000.00 on the Oxford Street upgrade,
they had never once returned to the area to see 'how things
went'. That's right, five years, not one community meeting (point
being that the Inner
East and City East meetings do not cover Oxford Street).
Stunningly, they said, yes, okay, thats a great idea, we can
do that next year (2010). You would have thought that they might
have thought of this on their own, but no, it took meetings
with the CEO for this idea to happen, you'd think one of their
1500 paid staff might have dreamed this up. NB: WAITING FOR
THIS TO HAPPEN.
4) At one of these meetings, Andrew Duckmanton suggested that
T2 at Taylor Square be bought and turned into a cycle hub for
council's new $220,000,000.00 bicycle network (NB: This use
was only one of many suggested 'combined uses' with the hope
of reclaiming Taylor Square for the community - post shop, police
shop front, council one stop shop to name a few).
But it was the bike hub idea that fit in with their 2030 plan
(a plan that was made for us, not with us - oh yes, typically,
the bureaucrats planned for us and then consulted at us - nothing
new here) and so, they did buy it, only thing is, when Andrew
met with Clover, she didn't even know it was his idea.
The point here is not one of appropriation of ideas (that is
what ideas are for) but the fact that the Lord Mayor was not
aware of the contribution of the local community. If this is
the case, then how can she possibly value it?
|
12/10/2009
|
Yet
another piece, you would think that the various levels of
government would be interested in getting together with the
local community (residents & businesses) and tap their
local knowledge for suggestions on how to solve this problem.
But no, they are too busy off being ineffective and covering
their asses.
Daily
Telegraph Article
Excerpt: "LATE-night revellers have turned Oxford St
into a dangerous chicken run, risking their lives and forcing
cars to swerve and dodge.
Some
people walk, some run - others just put their hand up to halt
oncoming cars and hope for the best. |
31/8/2009
|
excerpt:
"I don’t think Oxford Street caters well to anyone,”
says Damien Eames, head of Marketing at New Mardi Gras. “I
rarely go there anymore… Sydney’s mix of planning
controls and liquor licensing restrictions means there are
very few high intensity night life districts. There are only
so many venues that can be crammed into Kings Cross, Oxford
Street and George Street. The market isn’t really that
competitive and as a result venues can treat their customers
as cattle."
http://www.samesame.com.au/features/4436/Has-Sydney-Fallen-Asleep.htm
|
24/8/2009
|
It's
almost laughable how many people are
saying the same thing about Public Transport in Sydney with
NO ONE at the top listening.
This is our comment on the Sydney Morning Herald piece linked
to above:
"Integrated
ticketing and PT in Sydney is a great idea, but to refer to
it as radical is disingenuous to say the least. This has been
on the cards for years (some might say 100 years) but every
time a combination of wowsers and visionless politicians scuttle
things. For
those of you outside Sydney, bear in mind that this city generates
8% of GDP and gets rorted by the feds on GST as well. If we
don’t get our PT system sorted out A.S.A.P. Sydney will
continue to be a global laughing stock among other world cities:
nothing but a pretty harbour and a cold bleak CBD." |
16/7/2009
|
Council
recently held their bi-yearly community meetings: June 30
for Surry Hills (at the new Library) and July 9 for Darlinghurst
(at the Rex Centre Potts Point). Needless to say there was
little to no discussion of Oxford Street as it is so far away
from both these venues (bike lanes on Bourke Street and the
311 bus and were the hot ticket items - both issues local
to the immediate surrounds).
2 years ago we pointed out that the LAPs (Local Action Plans)
reinforced the concept of Oxford Street as boundary and therefore
relegated it to the bureaucratic netherworld. We were assured
the new LAP's (the Activity Hubs of Sustainable Sydney 2030)
would address this issue.
They
have not.
This
is no surprise and one can only assume that the entire council
is either completely incompetent or have some kind of directive
to ignore Lower Oxford Street and let it rot.
One can only wonder. |
23/6/2009
|
Comment
from Michael:
Oxford started to die 20 years ago when increasing rents forced
most people
to move away from Darlinghurst
The
2am lockout was the last nail in the coffin ... lets face
it .. its now
a hassle to go out anywhere near Oxford St on weekends these
days.. no
parking and no cabs at 2:30am! (and busses on weekends don't
come often
enough)
people
don't go out there by themselves any more (when that happens
you know
its dead!)
I
don't know if it can be saved now without some serious changes
in
everything from licensing to transport to freedom to move
between clubs.
|
19/6/2009
|
See
here our submissions on the City
of Sydney's DRAFT Corporate plan. As you can see, there are
serious grounds for concern regarding the City's management
far beyond the confines of Lower Oxford Street, as pointed
out rather elegantly in the sydney
morning herald article below.
|
| 18/6/2009
|
A
excerpt from an article in the English Publication Monocle.
As you can see, the problems we have outlined are just part
of a far larger picture.
"Sydney,
says Monocle, may be blessed by nature, have an enviable lifestyle
and a thriving restaurant scene which shows Europe the meaning
of service. But its cultural life is a bit patchy and it is
cursed by an incompetent council that stymies all opportunities
that sweep into the city.
Melbourne
on the other hand nurtures its entrepreneurial brands, has
a thriving literary and cultural life, values its distinct
neighbourhoods and exudes self confidence. It is let down
only by its sprawl and buckling train network that has staff
handing icecreams out to par boiled passengers."
Please do not take this to mean we hate Sydney and Love Melbourne.
We don’t buy into that rival city garbage. This is merely
meant to serve as another ‘external’ example of
our point. That this city is run by people who at best, have
their eyes and ears firmly shut…
|
| 11/6/2009
|
A brutally honest piece from the Sydney
Morning Herald:
-------------------
Emerald city has lost its soul, not just its sparkle
Sydney
is not a lovely place in winter. The CBD is a biting wind
tunnel, Frank Sartor's granite footpaths are stained with
the grease from spilled milkshakes, the sun is thin, the faces
chapped and there's a pervading pong of rotten cooking oil
and urine.
You've
more chance of being crippled for life by a wild-eyed skateboarder
than you have of finding a delicious and inexpensive meal
after 2.30 in the afternoon. In fact, you can walk the entire
length of the city from Central to Circular Quay on some thoroughfares
and find nothing other than 1950-style cafes doing ham and
cheese on toast.
Forget
all the "Emerald City" nonsense, to borrow a line
from someone I can't remember; Sydney makes Dallas look like
Paris.
Here's
another line, from the late great French cultural figure and
politician, Andre Malraux. In Paris, he said, the city controls
the developers. The developers do not control the city. Naturally
he said it in French, so it sounded so much better.
Sydney's
what you get when the developers run the place. Badly designed,
cheaply finished buildings. You can count on the fingers of
one, maybe one-and-a-half, hands buildings constructed in
the CBD in the last 50 years where aesthetics were given at
least an even break with the money. The big institutions,
particularly the banks and Telstra, have given us some shockers.
Still,
we're used to shockers: the Cahill Expressway and the monorail
have helped deaden our response to whatever fresh hell is
around the corner. My personal favourites are the overhead
footways criss-crossing the city, like vast vacuum tubes sucking
consumers from one shopping extravaganza to another. If ever
there was a determined piece of civic uglification it is the
overhead pedestrian tunnel - the brute force of commerce crushing
charm.
The
old Carlton brewery site on Broadway, if work ever recommences,
will be massively overdeveloped - as will the Barangaroo project.
Opportunity after opportunity is missed - Darling Harbour
has the unmistakable aura of a tourist clip joint and that
other great promise, Pyrmont, is filled with apartments designed
for dwarfs.
Every
time an area requiring sensitive management comes on the horizon
a special planning committee filled with party hacks, mates,
real estaters and "planners" gets to work to eviscerate
the promise of something uplifting.
Of
course, there's the dazzle of the harbour and one or two incredible
structures. You can get the odd good Thai dinner in the suburbs
and there's the odd terrific new development (witness the
new community centre in Crown Street, Surry Hills).
But
what's happened to the soul of Sydney? The fact that the place
is crawling with merchant bankers doesn't do much for a soul,
but the real drag on the spirit has to be sheeted home to
the politicians, who at best are ordinary and at worse dubious.
And
that's what the city has become - ordinary and dubious.
There's
no leader whoever spruiks the spirited talk of the greatness
of city life and urban design. You have to go back 30 or more
years to the days of the Department of Urban and Regional
Development and Tom Uren to recall any government that had
a passing thought about urbanity.
It
was never on Howard's radar; however, the Ruddites have just
established something called the Major Cities Unit, which
exists in the Office of the Infrastructure Co-ordinator, the
outfit charged with "prioritising billions of dollars
in infrastructure investment".
But,
when you look at the visionless political oiks of NSW, night
after night on the box, you just know we haven't got a hope.
It makes you want to see again that little jumping jack Leo
Port, the former lord mayor of Sydney, who at least had some
energy and always seemed to be rolling out plans and poring
over models for improvements and beautification.
Today
there's political paralysis. A few years ago the Government
had an opportunity to tear down the Cahill Expressway, but
was frozen by the thought that there'd be a backlash from
the whingers in the bush if a red cent was spent doing something
half-decent for Sydney.
Still,
the great beer-barn developments in places such as Kings Cross
get waved through the development machine, including the Land
and Environment Court, while the small bars are stymied in
red tape. Try and get a civilised drink out of sight of a
poker machine, just keep trying.
John
O'Neill, the chairman of Events NSW, had a piece on these
pages on Monday. My pulse quickened as he wrote that the Business
Council and a whole pile of other worthies think it's about
time something was done about the city and the state. "Something
radical, a bit out of left field," he teased. This exciting
bit of boldness turned out to be "Brand Sydney",
yet another marketing exercise, or putting lipstick on the
pig. Apparently "Vivid Sydney", a winter wonderland
cultural event, is part of the brand. All I noticed was that
the Opera House was lit up.
Yet,
Sydney always manages to trick its way into getting listed
as an incredibly desirable place to live. It's equal eighth
on The Economist's latest "liveability ranking".
Last year in something called the annual Anholt City Brands
Index it came first. Don't believe it.
On
second thoughts that's a measure of branding. O'Neill's people
are doing well. Shame about our heart and soul.
justinian@lawpress.com.
|
15/4/2009
|
It
is truly disheartening to spend years of your lives as volunteers
in an endeavour to promote the wellbeing of the community within
which you live, only to have it continually thrown back in your
face. 18 months ago we came up with a plan to promote the Inner
East of Sydney (a half billion dollar economy and alternate
arts and culture Sydney CBD) and presented this plan to the
City of Sydney council executive. To this day nothing has happened.
After completing workshops
and attending meetings and dotting all the T’s and I’s
we were asked to and coming up with a plan, and presenting
the plan, the Inner East still languishes as the undiscovered
country to the East of the Harbour bridge and the Opera House
– It’s just through Hyde Park, and the rest of
it doesn't all look like South Oxford Street– honestly!
But really, you can truly
understand how someone who spent 36 hours in transit to get
to Sydney from the Northern Hemisphere, might end up in Darling
Harbour, shrug, sigh ‘is this it’ and never return.
In a time when Sydney needs
every competitive angle it can get to attract new visitors,
our Lord Mayor thinks it’s more important to clean up
a train station, which just happens to be in an area where
lots of residents don’t like their train station (see
below), and told her so during the last election campaign.
Oxford Street is threatening
to go postal, the business community around it has been pointing
out for years that by supporting the day time traders and
arts and culture community, we could arrest this slide into
a frenzy of night time exchanges of body fluids. Admittedly,
we received two grants worth $97,000.00 with which we did
the research to discover that world’s best practice
in destination marketing/area management would cost about
3 million. But this is where it stopped.
We did what we were asked
to do, outlined the problem, suggested solutions and are stuck
where we were 18 months ago.
One can only assume that they
don’t particularly care. Or perhaps their vote is safe
in this neighbourhood because the only resident’s groups
(the people who are listened to in the running of Sydney)
that exist in this area are at odds with each other and don’t
speak with a united voice.
Clover,
we implore you to recognise the value of the Inner East and
be our champion. Help us access state and federal funds. Take
charge of Oxford Street! Help us promote the Inner east, with
its huge economy, to the rest of the State, Country and World.
Help us show that Sydney is more than just a bridge and a
harbour.
Stop the meetings. Show the consultants the door, and take
some action! PLEASE!
------------------------------------------
This rant was inspired by the following article:
http://sydney-central.whereilive.com.au/news/story/newtown-station-urban-blight-lord-mayor/
Newtown
station is an urban blight with vacant shopfronts and big
problems with disability access, Lord Mayor Clover Moore has
said.
In a rant against the station, in the heart of Newtown, Cr
Moore said Town Hall would work with the State Government
to try and improve the state of the busy transport hub.
Cr Moore has asked City of Sydney CEO Monica Barone to convene
a working group of representatives from the council and State
Government to work on the problem.
She said a recent meeting with State representatives had identified
Newtown as an important hub.
``There is a problem with vacant shopfronts,’’
Cr Moore said.
``Newtown station is an urban and visual blight. Undoubtedly
there are [also] disability access issues around the station'
|
19/2/2009
|
At
the end of last year there was some kafuffle at council regarding
newsstands and the fact that MX had paid heaps of cash to hand
out their papers. During this debate the issue of disability
access came up in the context that news paper stands for all
free publications would impair access.
It was at this stage that
we emailed the entire mailing list, comprising the Lord Mayor,
CoS Councillors and long list of Concerned Stakeholders about
the apparent incongruity of invoking disabled access when
the ‘disability access’ ball was dropped so badly
by council on the 2006 of Oxford Square
upgrade.
After
having brought this up with numerous council people on numerous
occasions over the course of two years, it was only after
this email bomb that the bollards were quietly removed. We
post here the Lord Mayor’s response to out initial letter
and our reply to it, sent today.
The exchange speaks for itself.
|
| 30/1/2009
|
On
the 15th of December 2008 we sent an email
to Councillor John McInerney asking whether Clover’s
Independent team would consider championing the ‘remaking’
of Oxford Street in the way that they were Albion and Crown.
We have, as of this date, not received a reply.
|
13/12/2008
|
The
City of Sydney Planning
Development and Transport Committee meeting on Monday
the 8th Dec 2008 and unanimously supported Independent Councillor
John McInerney's amendment to pursue returning Foveaux and
Albion Streets to two-way traffic. The Reason given was that
the current one-way arrangement creates freeway conditions
that encourage speed, undermine pedestrian safety and divide
the Surry Hills village.
We strongly support this kind of thinking
and encourage City of Sydney council to consider Oxford Street
ion their dealings with the RTA.
|
4/12/2008
|
Well
done, I look forward to watching the progress of the campaign
to save Oxford St.
|
16/11/2008
|
Really
good work from the DBP. I hope the people in council take
the time to read it and re-invigorate the strip.
|
| 16/11/2008
|
Hi.Yes
\"Bring Back the Boulevard\"!
Its
great to see business supporting changes.
All
best |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
site
designed, built, written & maintained by Stephan Gyory__
|